Nefrectomía parcial y radical laparoscópica en tumores renales cT1. Análisis comparativo de complicaciones y supervivencia / Laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy in cT1 renal tumors. Comparative analysis of complications and survival

Introducción y objetivos: Análisis comparativo de complicaciones postoperatorias y supervivencia entre nefrectomía parcial (NP) y radical (NR) laparoscópica en cáncer de células renales (CCR) cT1.Material y método: Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes birrenos con tumor renal único cT1 tratados en nuestro centro entre los años 2005 y 2018 mediante NP o NR laparoscópica.Resultados: Cumplieron los criterios de inclusión para el estudio 372 pacientes. Fueron tratados mediante NR 156 (41,9%) y 216 (58,1%) mediante NP. En 10 (4,6%) NP y 6 (3,9%) NR hubo complicaciones Clavien Dindo III-V (p = 0,75). El índice de comorbilidad de Charlson (ICC) se identificó como variable predictora independiente de complicaciones (p = 0,02), no influyendo el tipo de cirugía en el análisis multivariante. La estimación de la supervivencia global (SG) fue de 81,2 y de 56,8% a los 5 y 10 años en el grupo de NR y de 90,2 y 75,7% en el grupo de NP, respectivamente (p = 0,0001). Se identificaron como factores predictores de mortalidad global la obesidad (HR 2,77, p = 0,01), el ICC ≥ 3 (HR 3,69, p = 0,001) y el FG<60 mL/min/1,73 m2 al alta (HR 1,87,p = 0,03). El tipo de nefrectomía no demostró influencia en la SG. La estimación de la supervivencia libre de recidiva (SLR) fue de 86,1% a los 5 y 10 años en el grupo de NR y de 93,5 y 83,6% en el grupo de NP respectivamente (p = 0,22).Conclusiones: La NP laparoscópica no es inferior a la NR en términos de seguridad oncológica y quirúrgica en el CCR cT1. El tipo de nefrectomía no influyó en la SG del paciente, sin embargo, sí se comportaron como factores predictores la obesidad, el índice Charlson ≥ 3 y el FG<60 mL/min/1,73 m2 al alta (AU)

Introduction and objectives: Comparative analysis of postoperative complications and survival between laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) in cT1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC).Material and method: Retrospective study of patients with two kidneys and single renal tumor cT1 treated in our center between 2005 and 2018 by laparoscopic PN or RN.Results: 372 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. RN was performed in 156 (41.9%) patients and PN in 216 (58.1%). Clavien Dindo III-V complications were observed in 10 (4,6%) PN and 6 (3,9%) RN patients (p = 0.75). The comorbidity Charlson index (CCI) was identified as an independent predictor variable of complications (p = 0.02) and surgical approach did not affect multivariate analysis. Estimated overall survival (OS) was 81.2% and 56.8% at 5 and 10 years in the RN group and 90.2% and 75.7% in the PN group, respectively (p = 0.0001). Obesity (HR 2.77, p = 0.01), CCI ≥ 3 (HR 3.69, p = 0.001) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73m2 at discharge (HR 1.87, p = 0.03) were identified as predictors of overall mortality. Nephrectomy approach showed no influence on OS. Estimated recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 86.1% at 5 and 10 years in the RN group and 93.5% and 83.6% in the PN group, respectively (p = 0.22).Conclusions: Laparoscopic PN is not inferior to RN in terms of oncologic and surgical safety in cT1 RCC. Nephrectomy approach did not influence patient OS, however, obesity, CCI ≥ 3 and GFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2 at discharge did behave as predictors (AU)

Laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy in cT1 renal tumors. Comparative analysis of complications and survival.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Comparative analysis of postoperative complications and survival between laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) in cT1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective study of patients with two kidneys and single renal tumor cT1 treated in our center between 2005 and 2018 by laparoscopic PN or RN. RESULTS: 372 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. RN was performed in 156 (41.9%) patients and PN in 216 (58.1%). Clavien Dindo III-V complications were observed in 10 (4,6%) PN and 6 (3,9%) RN patients (p = 0.75). The comorbidity Charlson index (CCI) was identified as an independent predictor variable of complications (p = 0.02) and surgical approach did not affect multivariate analysis. Estimated overall survival (OS) was 81.2% and 56.8% at 5 and 10 years in the RN group and 90.2% and 75.7% in the PN group, respectively (p = 0.0001). Obesity (HR 2.77, p = 0.01), CCI ≥ 3 (HR 3.69, p = 0.001) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at discharge (HR 1.87, p = 0.03) were identified as predictors of overall mortality. Nephrectomy approach showed no influence on OS. Estimated recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 86.1% at 5 and 10 years in the RN group and 93.5% and 83.6% in the PN group, respectively (p = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic PN is not inferior to RN in terms of oncologic and surgical safety in cT1 RCC. Nephrectomy approach did not influence patient OS, however, obesity, CCI ≥ 3 and GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at discharge did behave as predictors.

Comparison of surgical approaches to radical prostatectomy in our series beyond oncological and functional outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) compared to those of open (ORP) and laparoscopic (LRP) surgery. The interest lies fundamentally in the quality-of-life (QoL) evaluation, postoperative recovery, and personal satisfaction of patients with the intervention (PS) beyond oncological and functional outcomes. METHODS: Six hundred eighty-five RPs were performed in our center between 2011-2018 (17,8% ORP, 22,2% LRP and 60% RARP). Patients were prospectively assessed through follow-up until April 2020 and a multiple questionnaire at 12-months post-RP that included ICIQ-SF, SHIM, IPSS, IQL and questions about pain, postoperative recovery and PS. Also baseline and postoperative patient- and treatment-related data were collected, and binomial logistic regressions were performed for the 1 vs.1 comparisons (ORP vs. RARP and LRP vs. RARP). RESULTS: RARP patients have overall fewer comorbidities, less tumor aggressiveness, more operative time requirements and more positive surgical margins than ORP and LRP patients. Nevertheless, RARP outperforms ORP in: hospital stay (days) (OR 0,86; 95% CI: 0,80-0,94), hemoglobin loss (OR 0,38; 95% CI: 0,30-0,47), transfusion rate (OR 0,18; 95% CI: 0,09-0,34), early complications (p = 0,001), IQL (OR 0,82; 95% CI: 0,69-0,98), erectile function (OR 0,41; 95% CI: 0,21-0,79), pain control (OR 0,82; 95% CI: 0,75-0,89), postoperative recovery (p < 0,001) and choice of a different approach (OR 5,55; 95% CI: 3,14-9,80). RARP is superior to LRP in: urinary continence (OR 0,55; 95% CI: 0,37-0,82), IPSS (OR 0,96; 95% CI: 0,93-0,98), IQL (OR 0,76; 95% CI: 0,66-0,88), erectile function (OR 0,52; 95% CI: 0,29-0,93), postoperative recovery (p = 0,02 and 0,004), PS (p = 0,005; 0,002; and 0,03) and choice of a different approach (OR 7,79; 95% CI: 4,63-13,13). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of our study globally endorse a positive effectiveness of RARP over ORP and/or LRP, both on functional issues, postoperative recovery, QoL and PS. Oncologic results should still be improved.

Evolución de la función renal en pacientes con cáncer renal cT1 después de nefrectomía parcial y radical laparoscópica. Factores predictores de deterioro de función renal / Evolution of renal function in patients with cT1 renal tumors after laparoscopic partial and radical nephrectomy. Predictive factors for renal function impairment

Introducción y objetivos Analizar la evolución de la función renal tras nefrectomía parcial (NP) y radical (NR) laparoscópica e identificar factores predictores de deterioro de función renal.Material y método Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes birrenos con filtrado glomerular (FG) > 60 mL/min/1,73 m2 y tumor renal único cT1 tratados en nuestro centro entre los años 2005 y 2018.Resultados 372 pacientes cumplieron los criterios de inclusión para el estudio. 156 (41,9%) fueron tratados mediante NR y 216 (58,1%) mediante NP. Al alta hubo una diferencia de 26,75 mL/min/1,73 m2 de FG entre NR y NP. La edad > 60 años, las complicaciones postoperatorias (OR 2,97, p = 0,005) y NR (OR 10,03, p = 0,0001) fueron factores predictores de FG<60 mL/min/1,73 m2 al alta. Únicamente la NR (OR 7,69, p = 0,0001) se comportó como factor pronóstico independiente de FG<45 mL/min/1,73 m2 al alta. La mediana de seguimiento de la serie fue de 57 (IQR 28 - 100) meses. Al final del seguimiento, nueve (6%) pacientes tratados con NR desarrollaron enfermedad renal crónica (ERC) grave y tres (2%) insuficiencia renal terminal (IRT). Edad > 70 años, diabetes mellitus (DM) (HR 2,12, p = 0,001), hipertensión arterial (HTA) (HR 1,73, p = 0,01) y NR (HR 2,88, p = 0,0001) se comportaron como factores predictores independientes de FG<60 mL/min/1,73 m2. Para un FG<45 mL/min/1,73 m2 fueron edad > 70 años, DM (HR 1,99 IC 95% 1,04 a 3,83, p = 0,04) y NR (HR 5,88 IC 95% 2,57 a 13,45, p = 0,0001).Conclusiones La NR es un factor de riesgo a corto y largo plazo de ERC, aunque con baja probabilidad de ERC grave o IRT en pacientes con FG > 60 mL/min/1,73 m2 preoperatoria. La edad, DM e HTA contribuyen al empeoramiento de la función renal durante el seguimiento (AU)

Introduction and objectives To analyze the evolution of kidney function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) and to identify predictive factors for deterioration in kidney function.Material and method Retrospective study of patients with two kidneys, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and single renal tumor cT1, treated in our center between 2005 and 2018.Results A total of 372 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study; 156 (41.9%) were treated by RN and 216 (58.1%) by PN. There was a difference of 26.75 mL/min/1.73 m2 in GFR between RN and PN at discharge. Age > 60 years, postoperative complications (OR 2.97, p = 0.005) and RN (OR 10.03, p = 0.0001) were predictors of GFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at discharge. Only RN (OR 7.69, p = 0.0001) behaved as an independent prognostic factor for GFR<45 mL/min/1.73m2 at discharge. The median follow-up of the series was 57 (IQR 28-100) months. At the end of the follow-up period, nine (6%) patients treated with RN developed severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) and three (2%) developed end stage renal disease (ESRD). Age > 70 years, diabetes mellitus (DM) (HR 2.12, p = 0.001), arterial hypertension (AHT) (HR 1.73, p = 0.01) and RN (HR 2.88, p = 0.0001) behaved as independent predictors of GFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The independent predictors for GFR< 45 mL/min/1.73m2 were age >70 years, DM (HR 1.99 CI 95% 1.04-3.83, p = 0.04) and RN (HR 5.88 CI 95% 2.57-13.45, p = 0.0001).Conclusions RN is a short- and long-term risk factor for CKD, although with a low probability of severe CKD or ESRD in patients with preoperative GFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Age, DM and AHT contribute to worsening renal function during follow-up (AU)

Evolution of renal function in patients with cT1 renal tumors after laparoscopic partial and radical nephrectomy. Predictive factors for renal function impairment.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To analyze the evolution of kidney function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) and to identify predictive factors for renal function impairment. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Retrospective study of patients with two kidneys, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and single renal tumor cT1, treated in our center between 2005 and 2018. RESULTS: A total of 372 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study; 156 (41.9%) were treated with RN and 216 (58.1%) with PN. There was a difference of 26.75 mL/min/1.73 m2 in GFR between RN and PN at discharge. Age >60 years, postoperative complications (OR 2.97, p = 0.005) and RN (OR 10.03, p = 0.0001) were predictors of GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at discharge. Only RN (OR 7.69, p = 0.0001) behaved as an independent prognostic factor for GFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 at discharge. The median follow-up of the series was 57 (IQR 28-100) months. At the end of the follow-up period, nine (6%) patients treated with RN developed severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) and three (2%) developed end stage renal disease (ESRD). Age >70 years, diabetes mellitus (DM) (HR 2.12, p = 0.001), arterial hypertension (AHT) (HR 1.73, p = 0.01) and RN (HR 2.88, p = 0.0001) behaved as independent predictors of GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The independent predictors for GFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 were age >70 years, DM (HR 1.99 CI 95% 1.04-3.83, p = 0.04) and RN (HR 5.88 CI 95% 2.57-13.45, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RN is a short- and long-term risk factor for CKD although with a low probability of severe CKD or ESRD in patients with preoperative GFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Age, DM and AHT contribute to worsening renal function during follow-up.

Evolution of renal function in patients with CT1 renal tumors after laparoscopic partial and radical nephrectomy. Predictive factors for renal function impairment. / Evolución de la función renal en pacientes con cáncer renal cT1 después de nefrectomía parcial y radical laparoscópica. Factores predictores de deterioro de función renal.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To analyze the evolution of kidney function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) and to identify predictive factors for deterioration in kidney function. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Retrospective study of patients with two kidneys, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and single renal tumor cT1, treated in our center between 2005 and 2018. RESULTS: A total of 372 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study; 156 (41.9%) were treated by RN and 216 (58.1%) by PN. There was a difference of 26.75 mL/min/1.73 m2 in GFR between RN and PN at discharge. Age > 60 years, postoperative complications (OR 2.97, p = 0.005) and RN (OR 10.03, p = 0.0001) were predictors of GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at discharge. Only RN (OR 7.69, p = 0.0001) behaved as an independent prognostic factor for GFR < 45 mL/min/1.73m2 at discharge. The median follow-up of the series was 57 (IQR 28-100) months. At the end of the follow-up period, nine (6%) patients treated with RN developed severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) and three (2%) developed end stage renal disease (ESRD). Age > 70 years, diabetes mellitus (DM) (HR 2.12, p = 0.001), arterial hypertension (AHT) (HR 1.73, p = 0.01) and RN (HR 2.88, p = 0.0001) behaved as independent predictors of GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The independent predictors for GFR< 45 mL/min/1.73m2 were age >70 years, DM (HR 1.99 CI 95% 1.04-3.83, p = 0.04) and RN (HR 5.88 CI 95% 2.57-13.45, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RN is a short- and long-term risk factor for CKD, although with a low probability of severe CKD or ESRD in patients with preoperative GFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Age, DM and AHT contribute to worsening renal function during follow-up.

Análisis de supervivencia de los pacientes con cáncer de próstata con factores patológicos desfavorables tratados con prostatectomía radical y radioterapia de rescate tras la recidiva y persistencia bioquímica / Survival analysis of patients with prostate cancer and unfavorable risk factors treated with radical prostatectomy and salvage radiotherapy after biochemical recurrence and persistence

OBJETIVO: Analizar la supervivencia de los pacientes con cáncer de próstata (CP) con factores pronósticos desfavorables (FPD) tratados con PR y radioterapia de rescate (RTR) tras recidiva bioquímica (RB) y persistencia bioquímica (PB). MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Análisis retrospectivo de 446 pacientes con al menos uno de los siguientes FPD: score de Gleason ≥ 8, estadio patológico ≥ pT3 y/o márgenes quirúrgicos positivos (MQ+). El criterio de RB fue la elevación del PSA por encima de 0,4 ng/ml. Evaluación de supervivencia mediante Kaplan-Meier y log-rank. Para identificar factores de riesgo con posible influencia en la respuesta a RTR y la supervivencia causa-específica (SCE) se usó análisis uni y multivariable (regresión de Cox). RESULTADOS: Mediana de seguimiento: 72 (rango 37-122) meses, mediana de tiempo hasta RB: 42 (rango 20-112) meses. El 36,3% presentaron RB. Presentaron respuesta bioquímica a la RTR 121 (74,7%) pacientes. La supervivencia libre de recaída (SLR) después de la RTR a los 3, 5, 8 y 10 años fue del 95,7, del 92,3, del 87,9 y del 85%, la SG a los 5, 10 y 15 años fue del 95,6, del 86,5 y del 73,5%. La SCE a los 5, 10 y 15 años fue del 99,1, del 98,1 y del 96,6%, respectivamente. Solo el tiempo hasta la RB < 24 meses (HR = 2,55, p = 0,01) se comportó como un factor predictor independiente de SLR después de RTR. CONCLUSIONES: La PR solo consigue control de la enfermedad a los 10años en aproximadamente la mitad de los casos. El tratamiento multimodal secuencial (PR + RTR cuando precise) aumenta este control bioquímico hasta > 87%, lográndose una larga SCE. Los pacientes con un tiempo hasta recidiva > 24 meses respondieron mejor al tratamiento de rescate

OBJECTIVE: Survival analysis of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) with adverse prognostic factors (APF) treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) and salvage radiotherapy (SRT) after biochemical recurrence (BR) or biochemical persistence (BP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 446 patients with at least one of the following APF: Gleason score ≥ 8, pathologic stage ≥ pT3 and/or positive surgical margins. BR criteria used was PSA level over 0.4 ng/ml. A survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier was performed to compare the different variable categories with log-rank test. In order to identify risk factors for SRT response and cancer specific survival (CSS) we performed univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox regression. RESULTS: Mean follow up: 72 (IQR 27-122) months, mean time to BR: 42 (IQR 20-112) months, mean PSA level at BR: 0.56 (IQR 0.42-0.96). BR was present in 36.3% of the patients. Biochemical response to SRT was observed in 121 (75.7%) patients. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates after SRT at 3, 5, 8 and 10 years were 95.7%, 92.3%, 87.9%, and 85%; overall survival (OS) rates after 5, 10 and 15 years was 95.6%, 86.5% and 73.5%, respectively. CSS rates at 5, 10 and 15 years were 99.1%, 98.1% and 96.6%. Only time to BR < 24 months (HR = 2.55, P = .01) was identified as an independent risk factor for RFS after SRT. CONCLUSIONS: In these patients, RP only controls the disease in approximately half of the cases. Multimodal sequential treatment (RP+SRT when needed) increases this control, achieving high CSS rates and biochemical control in over 87% of the patients. Patients with time to recurrence > 24 months responded better to rescue treatment

Evaluación de los patrones de recurrencia por grupos de riesgo tras nefrectomía por cáncer renal / Analysis of recurrence trends according to risk groups after renal cancer nephrectomy

INTRODUCCIÓN: No están claramente definidos los patrones de recurrencia tras nefrectomía por cáncer renal. OBJETIVO: Evaluar patrones de recidiva en función del grupo de riesgo de recurrencia (GRR). MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Análisis retrospectivo de 696 pacientes con carcinoma de células renales tratados con nefrectomía entre 1990-2010. Se definieron tres GRR según la presencia de variables anatomopatológicas (estadio pTpN, grado nuclear, necrosis tumoral [NT], diferenciación sarcomatoide [DS], margen de resección positivo [MR]): -GR bajo (GRB): pT1pNx-0 G1-4, pT2pNx-0 G1-2; no NT, DS y/o MR (+). -GR intermedio (GRI): pT2pNx-0 G3-4;pT3-4pNx-0 G1-2; GRB con NT. -GR alto (GRA): pT3-4pNx-0 G3-4; pT1-4pN+; GRI con NT y/o DS; GRB con DS y/o MR (+). Para el contraste de variables cualitativas se utilizó el test de la Chi cuadrado. El método de Kaplan-Meier se ha utilizado para evaluar la supervivencia libre de recidiva en función de los GRR. Para evaluar diferencias entre las curvas de supervivencia se ha utilizado el test de log-rank. RESULTADOS: La mediana de seguimiento fue de 105 (IQR 63-148) meses. Del total de la serie recidivaron 177 (25,4%) pacientes: 15,9% a distancia, 4,9% local y 4,6% a distancia y local. La tasa de recurrencia varió según el grupo de riesgo con tasas del 72,9% en GRA, 16,9% en GRI y 10,2% en GRB (p = 0,0001). La recurrencia en órgano único fue mayoritaria en el GRB (72,2%) (p = 0,006). El GRB presentó recidiva en forma de metástasis única en el 50% de los casos, frente al 30% y 18,6% en GRI y GRA, respectivamente (p = 0,009). Las localizaciones de recurrencia más habituales fueron pulmón y abdomen. La localización pulmonar predominó en el GRA (72,9%) (p = 0,0001) y la abdominal en el GRB (83,3%) con una tendencia a la significación (p = 0,15). CONCLUSIONES: A medida que aumenta el grupo de riesgo aumentan las recurrencias, sobre todo óseas y pulmonares. En el GRB son más frecuentes las metástasis únicas y en órgano único

INTRODUCTION: Recurrence trends after renal cell cancer nephrectomy are not clearly defined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate recurrence trends according to recurrence risk groups (RRG). MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective analysis of 696 patients with renal cell cancer treated with nephrectomy between 1990-2010. Three RRG were defined according to the presence of anatomopathological variables (pTpN stage, nuclear grade, tumor necrosis [TN], sarcomatoid differentiation [SD], positive resection margin [RM]): -Low RG (LRG): pT1pNx-0 G1-4, pT2pNx-0 G1-2; no TN, SD and/or RM (+). -Intermediate RG (IRG): pT2pNx-0 G3-4; pT3-4pNx-0 G1-2; LRG with TN. -High RG (HRG): pT3-4pNx-0 G3-4; pT1-4pN+; IRG with TN and/or SD; LRG with SD and/or RM (+). The Kaplan-Meier method has been used to evaluate recurrence-free survival as a function of RRG. The log-rank test was used to evaluate differences between survival curves. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 105 (IQR 63-148) months. Of the total series, 177 (25.4%) patients presented recurrence: distant 15.9%, local 4.9% and 4.6% distant and local. The recurrence rate varied according to the RRG with values of 72.9% for HRG, 16.9% for IRG and 10.2% for LRG (p=.0001). Most cases in LRG presented single organ recurrence (72.2%) (p=.006). The LRG experienced recurrence as single metastasis in 50% of cases, compared to 30% and 18.6% in IRG and HRG, respectively (p=.009). The most common sites of recurrence were lung and abdomen. Lung recurrence predominated in the HRG (72.9%) (p=.0001) and abdominal, in the LRG (83.3%) with a tendency to significance (p=.15). CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence rates (especially bone and lung) increase with higher RG. Single organ recurrences and single metastases are more frequent in LRG

Survival analysis of patients with prostate cancer and unfavorable risk factors treated with radical prostatectomy and salvage radiotherapy after biochemical recurrence and persistence. / Análisis de supervivencia de los pacientes con cáncer de próstata con factores patológicos desfavorables tratados con prostatectomía radical y radioterapia de rescate tras la recidiva y persistencia bioquímica.

OBJECTIVE: Survival analysis of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) with adverse prognostic factors (APF) treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) and salvage radiotherapy (SRT) after biochemical recurrence (BR) or biochemical persistence (BP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 446 patients with at least one of the following APF: Gleason score ≥8, pathologic stage ≥pT3 and/or positive surgical margins. BR criteria used was PSA level over 0.4ng/ml. A survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier was performed to compare the different variable categories with log-rank test. In order to identify risk factors for SRT response and cancer specific survival (CSS) we performed univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox regression. RESULTS: Mean follow up: 72 (IQR 27-122) months, mean time to BR: 42 (IQR 20-112) months, mean PSA level at BR: 0.56 (IQR 0.42-0.96). BR was present in 36.3% of the patients. Biochemical response to SRT was observed in 121 (75.7%) patients. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates after SRT at 3, 5, 8 and 10years were 95.7%, 92.3%, 87.9%, and 85%; overall survival (OS) rates after 5, 10 and 15years was 95.6%, 86.5% and 73.5%, respectively. CSS rates at 5, 10 and 15years were 99.1%, 98.1% and 96.6%. Only time to BR <24months (HR=2.55, P=.01) was identified as an independent risk factor for RFS after SRT. CONCLUSIONS: In these patients, RP only controls the disease in approximately half of the cases. Multimodal sequential treatment (RP+SRT when needed) increases this control, achieving high CSS rates and biochemical control in over 87% of the patients. Patients with time to recurrence >24months responded better to rescue treatment.

Analysis of recurrence trends according to risk groups after renal cancer nephrectomy. / Evaluación de los patrones de recurrencia por grupos de riesgo tras nefrectomía por cáncer renal.

INTRODUCTION: Recurrence trends after renal cell cancer nephrectomy are not clearly defined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate recurrence trends according to recurrence risk groups (RRG). MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective analysis of 696 patients with renal cell cancer treated with nephrectomy between 1990-2010. Three RRG were defined according to the presence of anatomopathological variables (pTpN stage, nuclear grade, tumor necrosis [TN], sarcomatoid differentiation [SD], positive resection margin [RM]): -Low RG (LRG): pT1pNx-0 G1-4, pT2pNx-0 G1-2; no TN, SD and/or RM (+). -Intermediate RG (IRG): pT2pNx-0 G3-4; pT3-4pNx-0 G1-2; LRG with TN. -High RG (HRG): pT3-4pNx-0 G3-4; pT1-4pN+; IRG with TN and/or SD; LRG with SD and/or RM (+). The Kaplan-Meier method has been used to evaluate recurrence-free survival as a function of RRG. The log-rank test was used to evaluate differences between survival curves. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 105 (IQR 63-148) months. Of the total series, 177 (25.4%) patients presented recurrence: distant 15.9%, local 4.9% and 4.6% distant and local. The recurrence rate varied according to the RRG with values of 72.9% for HRG, 16.9% for IRG and 10.2% for LRG (p=.0001). Most cases in LRG presented single organ recurrence (72.2%) (p=.006). The LRG experienced recurrence as single metastasis in 50% of cases, compared to 30% and 18.6% in IRG and HRG, respectively (p=.009). The most common sites of recurrence were lung and abdomen. Lung recurrence predominated in the HRG (72.9%) (p=.0001) and abdominal, in the LRG (83.3%) with a tendency to significance (p=.15). CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence rates (especially bone and lung) increase with higher RG. Single organ recurrences and single metastases are more frequent in LRG.

Evaluación del abordaje laparoscópico en la cistectomía radical desde la implantación hasta su consolidación: validación interna / Evaluation of laparoscopic approach in radical cystectomy from implementation to consolidation: Internal validation

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: Las Guidelines de la AEU de 2017, consideran el acceso laparoscópico o asistido por robot como procedimientos en investigación. La curva de aprendizaje se define por el número mínimo de casos que es necesario realizar para reproducir la técnica considerada como estándar. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar en el mismo servicio, la implantación de un programa de cistectomía laparoscópica (CRL), comparándolo con un programa consolidado y estandarizado de cistectomía abierta (CRA). Material y MÉTODO: Análisis de cohortes retrospectivo de dos grupos de cistectomías: CRL (n = 196) (2006-2016) frente a CRA (n = 96) (2003-2005).comparación de la evolución en el tiempo de los siguientes parámetros: tiempo quirúrgico, las necesidad de transfusión, el estado de los márgenes quirúrgicos de resección, las complicaciones postoperatorias, la duración de la estancia hospitalaria y las recidivas. Se han definido 3 periodos de tiempo para CRL: implantación (2006-09) (CRLI), desarrollo (2010-14) (CRL-D) y consolidación (2015-16) (CRL-C); comparándose cada uno de ellos con el grupo control (CRA). Para el contraste de variables cualitativas se ha utilizado el test de la Chi cuadrado y para las variables numéricas el test de Anova. RESULTADOS: La CRL, en comparación con la CRA, presentó un mayor tiempo quirúrgico en las fases de CRL-I y CRL-D, observando una tendencia de menores tiempos operatorios que la CRA en el periodo de consolidación. La CRL presenta además menor trasfusión intraoperatoria en los 3 periodos y postoperatoria en CRL-D y CRL-C, menos complicaciones totales en CRL-D y CRL-C, menos complicaciones graves (Clavien ≥ 3) en las 3 fases; así como una disminución de la mortalidad y estancia hospitalaria desde la fase de CRL-I, consolidándose esta disminución en los otros dos periodos de estudio. No hemos observado diferencias significativas entre CRA y CRL en cuanto a márgenes quirúrgicos y recurrencias ni en el total de la serie ni en la comparación entre los distintos periodos, lo que avala la seguridad de la CRL, desde su inicio. CONCLUSIONES: La CRL frente a CRA mejora desde su implantación el porcentaje de transfusiones, de complicaciones y la estancia hospitalaria, con seguridad oncológica, a expensas de un mayor tiempo quirúrgico en las fases de implantación y DESARROLLO: Sin embargo, en nuestra serie observamos una tendencia de menores tiempos quirúrgicos que la CRA en el periodo de consolidación. En nuestro servicio el abordaje laparoscópico se ha validado en el tratamiento de la cistectomía radical

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The AEU Guidelines of 2017 consider laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches as investigational procedures. The surgical learning curve is defined as the minimum number of cases that a surgeon has to perform in order to reproduce a technique considered as standard. The aim of this study is to analyze, within our department, the implementation of a laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) program compared with a well consolidated and standardized open radical cystectomy (ORC) program. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of two cystectomy groups: LRC (n = 196) (20062016) vs. ORC (n = 96) (2003-2005).comparison of the evolution over time of the following parameters: operative time, blood transfusion rates, resection margins, postoperative complications, hospital stay and recurrence. Three time periods have been defined for LRC: implementation (2006-09) (LRC-I), development (2010-14) (LRC-D) and consolidation (2015-16) (LRC-C); comparing each of them with the control group (ORC). The chi-square test was used for the comparison of the qualitative variables and the Anova test for the numerical ones. RESULTS: When compared to ORC, LRC presented longer operative times in LRC-I and LRC-D periods. We observed a trend toward shorter operative time than ORC in the consolidation period (LRC-C). LRC also presented lower intraoperative transfusion rates in all periods and lower postoperative rates in CRL-D and CRL-C. Overall complications in LRC-D and LRC-C were lower in LRC, having fewer major complications (Clavien ≥ 3) in the 3 periods. A decrease in mortality and hospital stay after the LRC-I phase was also observed. These results were consolidated during the two last periods of the study. We have not observed significant differences between ORC and LRC when comparing surgical margins and recurrence rates, neither in the total series, nor in the comparison between the different periods. These results endorse the oncologic safety of LRC from the beginning of the implementation process. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to ORC, LRC improves perioperative transfusion rates, complications and hospital stay from its implementation period, maintaining oncological safety. On the contrary, longer operative times during implementation and development were observed. However, in our series, we observed a trend toward shorter operative times than ORC approach in the consolidation period. We have validated the laparoscopic approach for radical cystectomy in our service

Clasificación en grupos de riesgo de recurrencia tras nefrectomía por cáncer renal / Recurrence risk groups after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCCIÓN: No existe consenso sobre el seguimiento tras nefrectomía por cáncer renal (CCR), siendo necesario establecer grupos de riesgo de recurrencia (GRR). OBJETIVO: Clasificar en GRR los CCR. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Análisis retrospectivo de 696 pacientes con cáncer renal intervenidos entre 1990-2010; 568 (81,6%) pacientes con nefrectomía radical y 128 (18,4%) con nefrectomía parcial. Se clasificaron las variables patológicas como variables de 1. er nivel: estadio pTpN y grado de Fuhrman y variables patológicas de 2. ° nivel (VP2N): diferenciación sarcomatoide (DS), necrosis tumoral (NT), infiltración microvascular y márgenes de resección (MR). Realizamos un análisis multivariante (regresión de Cox) para identificar las variables de 1. er nivel relacionadas con la recurrencia. Clasificamos a los pacientes en 3 GRR según las variables de primer nivel: bajo (GRB) < 25%, intermedio (GRI) 26-50% y alto (GRA) > 50%. Tras ello realizamos un análisis univariante y multivariante con las VP2N para cada GRR. Con estos datos se reclasificaron los pacientes en GRR+. Para la comparación de los GRR con los GRR+ se utilizaron curvas ROC. RESULTADOS: La mediana de seguimiento fue de 105 (IQR 63-148) meses. Recidivaron 177 (25,4%) PACIENTES: 111 (62,7%) con recidiva a distancia, 34 (19,2%) recidiva local y 32 (18%) a distancia y local. Se comportaron como factores predictores independientes de recurrencia el grado de Fuhrman (HR = 2,75; p = 0,0001) y el estadio pTpN (HR = 2,19; p = 0,0001). Se agruparon los pacientes en GRR (ABC = 0,76; p = 0,0001): - GRB (pT1pNx-0 G1-4; pT2pNx-0 G1-2): 456 (65,5%) pacientes. - GRI (pT2pNx-0 G3-4; pT3-4pNx-0 G1-2): 110 (15,8%) pacientes. - GRA (pT3-4pNx-0 G3-4; pT1-4pN+): 130 (18,6%) pacientes. Tras el análisis multivariable con las VP2N, los GRR se reclasificaron (GRR+) (ABC = 0,84; p = 0,0001): -GRB+: GRB sin NT, DS y/o MR(+). -GRI+: GRI; GRB con NT. -GRA+: GRA; GRB con DS y/o MR(+); GRI con NT y/o DS. CONCLUSIONES: La adición de las variables patológicas de segundo nivel a la clasificación, según las variables de primer nivel, mejora la capacidad de discriminación de la clasificación en GRR

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus on the follow-up protocol after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and the identification of recurrence risk groups (RRG) is required. OBJECTIVE: Establish recurrence risk groups (RRG). Material and method: A retrospective analysis of 696 patients with renal cancer submitted to surgery between 1990-2010; 568 (81.6%) patients treated with radical nephrectomy and 128 (18.4%) treated with partial nephrectomy. Pathological variables were classified as: 1st-level variables (1LPV): pTpN stage and Fuhrman grade (FG); and 2nd level pathological variables (2LPV): sarcomatoid differentiation (SD), tumor necrosis (TN), microvascular invasion (MVI) and positive surgical margins (PSM). Univariate and multivariate analysis have been performed using Cox regression to determine 1LPV related to recurrence. Based on 1LPV, we classified patients into three RRG: Low (LRG) < 25%; Intermediate (IRG) 26-50% and High (HRG) > 50%. We performed univariate and multivariate analysis with the 2 LPVs for each RRG. With these data, patients were reclassified as RRG+. ROC curves were used for comparison of RRG and RRG+. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 105 months (range 63 to 148). There were 177 (25.4%) patients with recurrence: 111 (15.9%) distant, 34 (4.9%) local and 32 (4.6%) distant and local. In the multivariable analysis, Fuhrman grade (HR=2,75; P=.0001) and pTpN stage (HR = 2,19; P = .0001) behaved as independent predictive variables of recurrence. Patients were grouped as RRG (AUC = 0,76; p = 0,0001): - LRG (pT1pNx-0 G1-4; pT2pNx-0 G1-2): 456 (65,5%) PATIENTS: - IRG (pT2pNx-0 G3-4; pT3-4pNx-0 G1-2): 110 (15,8%) PATIENTS: - HRG (pT3-4pNx-0 G3-4; pT1-4pN+): 130 (18,6%) PATIENTS: After multivariate analysis with 2LPV, RRG were reclassified (RRG+) (AUC = .84, P = .0001): -LRG+(LRG without TN, SD and/or PSM(+)). -IRG+(IRG; LRG with TN) -HRG+(HRG; LRG with SD and/or PSM(+); IRG with TN and/or SD) CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of 2LPV to the classification according to VP1N improves the discriminating capacity of RRG classification

Recurrence risk groups after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. / Clasificación en grupos de riesgo de recurrencia tras nefrectomía por cáncer renal.

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus on the follow-up protocol after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and the identification of recurrence risk groups (RRG) is required. OBJECTIVE: Establish recurrence risk groups (RRG). MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective analysis of 696 patients with renal cancer submitted to surgery between 1990-2010; 568 (81.6%) patients treated with radical nephrectomy and 128 (18.4%) treated with partial nephrectomy. Pathological variables were classified as: 1st-level variables (1LPV): pTpN stage and Fuhrman grade (FG); and 2nd level pathological variables (2LPV): sarcomatoid differentiation (SD), tumor necrosis (TN), microvascular invasion (MVI) and positive surgical margins (PSM). Univariate and multivariate analysis have been performed using Cox regression to determine 1LPV related to recurrence. Based on 1LPV, we classified patients into three RRG: Low (LRG)<25%; Intermediate (IRG) 26-50% and High (HRG)>50%. We performed univariate and multivariate analysis with the 2LPVs for each RRG. With these data, patients were reclassified as RRG+. ROC curves were used for comparison of RRG and RRG+. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 105 months (range 63 to 148). There were 177 (25.4%) patients with recurrence: 111 (15.9%) distant, 34 (4.9%) local and 32 (4.6%) distant and local. In the multivariable analysis, Fuhrman grade (HR=2,75; P=.0001) and pTpN stage (HR=2,19; P=.0001) behaved as independent predictive variables of recurrence. Patients were grouped as RRG (AUC=0,76; p=0,0001): - LRG (pT1pNx-0 G1-4; pT2pNx-0 G1-2): 456 (65,5%) patients. - IRG (pT2pNx-0 G3-4; pT3-4pNx-0 G1-2): 110 (15,8%) patients. - HRG (pT3-4pNx-0 G3-4; pT1-4pN+): 130 (18,6%) patients. After multivariate analysis with 2LPV, RRG were reclassified (RRG+) (AUC=.84, P=.0001): -LRG+(LRG without TN, SD and/or PSM(+)). -IRG+(IRG; LRG with TN) -HRG+(HRG; LRG with SD and/or PSM(+); IRG with TN and/or SD) CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of 2LPV to the classification according to VP1N improves the discriminating capacity of RRG classification.

Evaluation of laparoscopic approach in radical cystectomy from implementation to consolidation: Internal validation. / Evaluación del abordaje laparoscópico en la cistectomía radical desde la implantación hasta su consolidación: validación interna.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The AEU Guidelines of 2017 consider laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches as investigational procedures. The surgical learning curve is defined as the minimum number of cases that a surgeon has to perform in order to reproduce a technique considered as standard. The aim of this study is to analyze, within our department, the implementation of a laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) program compared with a well consolidated and standardized open radical cystectomy (ORC) program. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of two cystectomy groups: LRC (n=196) (20062016) vs. ORC (n=96) (2003-2005). Comparison of the evolution over time of the following parameters: operative time, blood transfusion rates, resection margins, postoperative complications, hospital stay and recurrence. Three time periods have been defined for LRC: implementation (2006-09) (LRC-I), development (2010-14) (LRC-D) and consolidation (2015-16) (LRC-C); comparing each of them with the control group (ORC). The chi-square test was used for the comparison of the qualitative variables and the Anova test for the numerical ones. RESULTS: When compared to ORC, LRC presented longer operative times in LRC-I and LRC-D periods. We observed a trend toward shorter operative time than ORC in the consolidation period (LRC-C). LRC also presented lower intraoperative transfusion rates in all periods and lower postoperative rates in CRL-D and CRL-C. Overall complications in LRC-D and LRC-C were lower in LRC, having fewer major complications (Clavien≥3) in the 3 periods. A decrease in mortality and hospital stay after the LRC-I phase was also observed. These results were consolidated during the two last periods of the study. We have not observed significant differences between ORC and LRC when comparing surgical margins and recurrence rates, neither in the total series, nor in the comparison between the different periods. These results endorse the oncologic safety of LRC from the beginning of the implementation process. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to ORC, LRC improves perioperative transfusion rates, complications and hospital stay from its implementation period, maintaining oncological safety. On the contrary, longer operative times during implementation and development were observed. However, in our series, we observed a trend toward shorter operative times than ORC approach in the consolidation period. We have validated the laparoscopic approach for radical cystectomy in our service.

Port site and peritoneal metastasis following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and salvage radiotherapy for prostate adenocarcinoma. / Metástasis peritoneal y en puerto de laparoscopia tras prostatectomía radical laparoscópica y radioterapia de rescate por adenocarcinoma prostático.

OBJECTIVE: Metastatic involvement in the port site used to perform laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) is very infrequent. METHODS: We report the case of a patient with port site and peritoneal metastasis after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and salvage radiotherapy. RESULTS: 60-year-old male with a history of LRP due to Gleason score 7 (3+4) prostate adenocarcinoma with posterior salvage radiotherapy after biochemical recurrence. Appearance of metastatic lesion at one of the laparoscopic port site followed by third left rib and peritoneal metastasis, treated with local excision and subsequent hormonotherapy and chemotherapy (HT+QT). CONCLUSIONS: Metastatic extension of prostate adenocarcinoma at a port site after performing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a highly exceptional situation. The elevation of PSA levels and image tests (PET-CT) help in the diagnosis. Histopathological confirmation must be performed using Fine Needle Aspiration(FNA). Surgical excision is the treatment of choice. Adjuvant therapy (HT+QT) can help complete the treatment scheme.

OBJETIVO: La afectación metastásica a nivel de los puertos de laparoscopia utilizados para la realización de prostatectomía radical laparoscópica (PRL) es muy infrecuente.MÉTODO: Presentamos el caso de un paciente con afectación metastásica peritoneal y a nivel del puerto de laparoscopia tras PRL y radioterapia de rescate. RESULTADOS: Varón de 60 años, tratado con PRL por adenocarcinoma prostático con score Gleason 7(3+4) y radioterapia de rescate tras recidiva bioquímica. Aparición de afectación metastásica a nivel del puerto de laparoscopia, 3ª costilla izquierda y peritoneal consecutivamente, tratado con resección local y hormonoterapia+quimioterapia (HT+QT) posterior.CONCLUSIÓN: La afectación metastásica por adenocarcinoma prostático a nivel del puerto de laparoscopia tras la realización de PRL es un hecho altamente infrecuente. La elevación de PSA, así como las pruebas de imagen (PET-TC) ayudan a su diagnóstico. Su confirmación anatomopatológica ha de realizarse mediante PAAF. La escisión quirúrgica es el tratamiento imperativo. El tratamiento adyuvante (HT+QT) ayuda a completar el esquema terapéutico.

Metástasis peritoneal y en puerto de laparoscopia tras prostatectomía radical laparoscópica y radioterapia de rescate por adenocarcinoma prostático / Port site and peritoneal metastasis following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and salvage radiotherapy for prostate adenocarcinoma

OBJETIVO: La afectación metastásica a nivel de los puertos de laparoscopia utilizados para la realización de prostatectomía radical laparoscópica (PRL) es muy infrecuente. MÉTODO: Presentamos el caso de un paciente con afectación metastásica peritoneal y a nivel del puerto de laparoscopia tras PRL y radioterapia de rescate. RESULTADOS: Varón de 60 años, tratado con PRL por adenocarcinoma prostático con score Gleason 7(3+4) y radioterapia de rescate tras recidiva bioquímica. Aparición de afectación metastásica a nivel del puerto de laparoscopia, 3ª costilla izquierda y peritoneal consecutivamente, tratado con resección local y hormonoterapia+quimioterapia (HT+QT) posterior. CONCLUSIÓN: La afectación metastásica por adenocarcinoma prostático a nivel del puerto de laparoscopia tras la realización de PRL es un hecho altamente infrecuente. La elevación de PSA, así como las pruebas de imagen (PET-TC) ayudan a su diagnóstico. Su confirmación anatomopatológica ha de realizarse mediante PAAF. La escisión quirúrgica es el tratamiento imperativo. El tratamiento adyuvante (HT+QT) ayuda a completar el esquema terapéutico

OBJECTIVE: Metastatic involvement in the port site used to perform laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) is very infrequent. METHODS: We report the case of a patient with port site and peritoneal metastasis after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and salvage radiotherapy. RESULTS: 60-year-old male with a history of LRP due to Gleason score 7 (3+4) prostate adenocarcinoma with posterior salvage radiotherapy after biochemical recurrence. Appearance of metastatic lesion at one of the laparoscopic port site followed by third left rib and peritoneal metastasis, treated with local excision and subsequent hormonotherapy and chemotherapy (HT+QT). CONCLUSIONS: Metastatic extension of prostate adenocarcinoma at a port site after performing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is a highly exceptional situation. The elevation of PSA levels and image tests (PET-CT) help in the diagnosis. Histopathological confirmation must be performed using Fine Needle Aspiration(FNA). Surgical excision is the treatment of choice. Adjuvant therapy (HT+QT) can help complete the treatment scheme

[Mucin-producing urothelial type prostatic adenocarcinoma with signet ring cells and increased Ca 19.9 and Cea. Case report and literature review.] / Adenocarcinoma mucinoso de próstata tipo urotelial con células en anillo de sello y elevación del Ca 19.9 y Cea. Revisión de la literatura a propósito de un caso.

OBJECTIVE: Primary Mucin-producing Urothelial-type Adenocarcinoma of Prostate is extremely infrequent. The presence of signet ring cells is exceptional, more atypical in its mucinous variant. Anatomopathological and immunohistochemical study play a key role. METHODS: Bibliographic review and case report of a 66-year-old man with Ca 19.9 and CEA elevation, and normal PSA levels, associated with lower urinary tract symptoms (mucosuria, hesitancy and hematuria). He was diagnosed with mucin-producing urothelial- type adenocarcinoma of the prostate with signet ring cells by transrectal prostate biopsy after multiparametic MRI. RESULTS: We found 23 cases described in our review. No case diagnosed following an elevation of Ca 19.9 was found in the literature. In our case, after diagnosis, he was treated with retropubic radical prostatectomy and bilateral ilio-obturator lymph node dissection, with subsequent normalization of tumor markers; however, he presented secondary pulmonary involvement and pelvic tumor progression despite chemotherapy treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The elevation of associated tumor markers (Ca 19.9, CEA) is extraordinary. There is no treatment algorithm, however surgery (radical prostatectomy) with or without adjuvant chemotherapy treatment represents an alternative in its therapeutic management.

OBJETIVO: El adenocarcinoma primario de próstata de tipo urotelial es extremadamente infrecuente. La presencia de células en anillo de sello es excepcional, siendo más atípica aún en su variante mucinosa. Su estudio anatomopatológico e inmunohistoquímico juegan un papel fundamental.MÉTODOS: Revisión de la literatura a propósito del caso de un varón de 66 años con elevación de Ca 19.9 y CEA, y niveles de PSA normales, asociado a sintomatología del tracto urinario inferior (mucosuria, estranguria y hematuria) diagnosticado mediante biopsia prostática transrectal tras RMN multiparamétrica de un adenocarcinoma mucinoso de próstata tipo urotelial con células en anillo de sello. RESULTADOS: En la revisión efectuada se han encontrado descritos 23 casos. No se ha encontrado en la literatura ningún caso diagnosticado a raíz de una elevación del Ca 19.9. En nuestro caso, tras el diagnóstico fue tratado mediante prostatectomía radical retropúbica con linfadenectomía ilio-obturatriz bilateral, con normalización posterior de los marcadores tumorales; sin embargo, presentó afectación secundaria pulmonar y progresión tumoral pélvica a pesar de tratamiento quimioterápico. CONCLUSIONES: La elevación de marcadores tumorales asociada (Ca 19.9, CEA) es extraordinaria en este tipo de tumores. No existe un algoritmo de tratamiento, sin embargo la cirugía (prostatectomía radical) con o sin tratamiento adyuvante quimioterápico representa una alternativa en su manejo terapéutico.

Adenocarcinoma mucinoso de próstata tipo urotelial con células en anillo de sello y elevación del Ca 19.9 y Cea. Revisión de la literatura a propósito de un caso / Mucin-producing urothelial type prostatic adenocarcinoma with signet ring cells and increased Ca 19.9 and Cea. Case report and literature review

Objetivo: El adenocarcinoma primario de próstata de tipo urotelial es extremadamente infrecuente. La presencia de células en anillo de sello es excepcional, siendo más atípica aún en su variante mucinosa. Su estudio anatomopatológico e inmunohistoquímico juegan un papel fundamental. Métodos: Revisión de la literatura a propósito del caso de un varón de 66 años con elevación de Ca 19.9 y CEA, y niveles de PSA normales, asociado a sintomatología del tracto urinario inferior (mucosuria, estranguria y hematuria) diagnosticado mediante biopsia prostática transrectal tras RMN multiparamétrica de un adenocarcinoma mucinoso de próstata tipo urotelial con células en anillo de sello. Resultados: En la revisión efectuada se han encontrado descritos 23 casos. No se ha encontrado en la literatura ningún caso diagnosticado a raíz de una elevación del Ca 19.9. En nuestro caso, tras el diagnóstico fue tratado mediante prostatectomía radical retropúbica con linfadenectomía ilio-obturatriz bilateral, con normalización posterior de los marcadores tumorales; sin embargo, presentó afectación secundaria pulmonar y progresión tumoral pélvica a pesar de tratamiento quimioterápico. Conclusiones: La elevación de marcadores tumorales asociada (Ca 19.9, CEA) es extraordinaria en este tipo de tumores. No existe un algoritmo de tratamiento, sin embargo la cirugía (prostatectomía radical) con o sin tratamiento adyuvante quimioterápico representa una alternativa en su manejo terapéutico

Objective: Primary Mucin-producing Urothelial-type Adenocarcinoma of Prostate is extremely infrequent. The presence of signet ring cells is exceptional, more atypical in its mucinous variant. Anatomopathological and immunohistochemical study play a key role. Methods: Bibliographic review and case report of a 66-year-old man with Ca 19.9 and CEA elevation, and normal PSA levels, associated with lower urinary tract symptoms (mucosuria, hesitancy and hematuria). He was diagnosed with mucin-producing urothelial-type adenocarcinoma of the prostate with signet ring cells by transrectal prostate biopsy after multiparametic MRI. Results: We found 23 cases described in our review. No case diagnosed following an elevation of Ca 19.9 was found in the literature. In our case, after diagnosis, he was treated with retropubic radical prostatectomy and bilateral ilio-obturator lymph node dissection, with subsequent normalization of tumor markers; however, he presented secondary pulmonary involvement and pelvic tumor progression despite chemotherapy treatment. Conclusions: The elevation of associated tumor markers (Ca 19.9, CEA) is extraordinary. There is no treatment algorithm, however surgery (radical prostatectomy) with or without adjuvant chemotherapy treatment represents an alternative in its therapeutic management

Complicaciones posquirúrgicas en los pacientes con cáncer de vejiga tratados con cistectomía: Diferencias entre el abordaje abierto y laparoscópico / Post-surgical complications in patients with bladder cancer treated with cystectomy: Differences between open and laparoscopic approach

Introducción: La cirugía mínimamente invasiva en la cistectomía no ha tenido el mismo desarrollo que en otras cirugías urológicas, entre otros motivos por la falta de estudios publicados que definan las ventajas de este abordaje frente a la cirugía abierta. Objetivos: El principal objetivo de este estudio es establecer el papel de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva, laparoscopia, en la cistectomía radical frente a la cirugía abierta en un análisis de complicaciones perioperatorias. Material y método: Análisis de cohortes retrospectivo de complicaciones perioperatorias de 2series homogéneas de cistectomías: laparoscópica (n = 196) frente a abierta (n = 197). Identificación mediante análisis multivariante de factores independientes predictores de complicaciones perioperatorias. Resultados: En el análisis comparativo entre el abordaje laparoscópico y el abierto observamos una menor tasas de trasfusión perioperatoria (p < 0,0001), una menor tasa de complicaciones postoperatorias globales (p < 0,0001) así como en el subgrupo de complicaciones graves (Clavien > 3; p < 0,001). También una menor tasa de mortalidad en la serie de laparoscópica frente a la abierta (p<0,0001). Identificamos como factor independiente predictor de complicaciones al abordaje quirúrgico y la duración de la cirugía (p < 0,001). Conclusiones: En nuestro estudio identificamos el abordaje laparoscópico como protector de complicaciones en la cistectomía radical. El abordaje abierto casi triplica el riesgo de tener complicaciones

Introduction: Minimally invasive surgery regarding cystectomy has not had the same development as other urological surgeries. This could be due to the lack of published studies defining the advantages of this approach versus open surgery. Objectives: The main objective of this study is to establish the role of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic radical cystectomy, versus open surgery by analyzing their perioperative complications. Material and method: Retrospective cohort analysis of perioperative complications of 2 homogeneous series of cystectomies: laparoscopic (n=196) versus open (n = 197). Identification of independent predictors of perioperative complications by multivariate analysis. Results: In the comparative analysis between laparoscopic cystectomies and open cystectomies we observed a lower rate of perioperative blood transfusion (p < 0.0001), a lower rate of global postoperative complications (p < 0.0001) and a lower rate of serious complications (Clavien > 3; p < 0.001) in the LRC group. There was also a lower mortality rate in the laparoscopic series compared to open ones (p < 0.0001). Surgical approach and surgical time (p < 0.001) were identified as independent predictors of complications. Conclusions: We have identified the laparoscopic approach as a complication shield for radical cystectomy. The open approach almost triples the risk of complications

Comparación del rendimiento entre biopsia transrectal clásica y biopsia "cognitiva" ecodirigida en la rebiopsia de la próstata / Comparison of classical transrectal prostate biopsy versus cognitive registration in rebiopsy

Introducción: El objetivo es comparar el rendimiento de la secuencia resonancia magnética (RM) y biopsia transrectal «cognitiva» (BTRCog) frente a la biopsia transrectal clásica (BTRCl) en pacientes con al menos una biopsia de próstata (BP) negativa. Material y método: Análisis retrospectivo de 205 pacientes con al menos una BP negativa. A 144 (70,2%) pacientes se les realizó antes de la biopsia una RM y a 61 (29,8%) no. Los nódulos se clasificaron según la clasificación PI-RADS v2 agrupando pZa, pZpl y pZpm como zona periférica (ZP), Tza, Tzp y CZ como zona transicional (ZT) y áreas AS como zona anterior (ZA). A los pacientes con RM se les realizó BTRCog. A los pacientes sin RM se les realizó una BTRCl de la ZP y de la ZT. Comparación de variables cualitativas con test de la chi2 y de cuantitativas con t de Student. Análisis multivariante (regresión logística) para identificar variables predictoras. Resultados: La mediana de edad fue 68 (IQR 62-72%) años, de PSA 8,3 (IQR 6,2-11,7) ng/ml y del número de biopsias previas fue 1 (IQR 1-2). En 169 (82,4%) el tacto rectal (TR) fue normal, mientras que en 36 (17,6%) sospechoso (cT2a-b en 34 y cT2c en 2). La mediana del volumen prostático (VP) fue de 48 (IQR 38-65) cc. Existió diferencia en el PSAD (p = 0,03) entre ambos grupos. En la ETR se identificó nódulo hipoecoico en 8 (13,1%) pacientes con BTRCl y en 62(43,1%) (p = 0,0001) con BTRCog. La mediana de cilindros extraídos en BTRCl fue 10 (IQR 10-10) y en el grupo BTRCog fue 11 (IQR 9-13) (p = 0,75). Se diagnosticó cáncer en 74 (36,1%) pacientes. En BTRCl 10 (16,4%) y en BTRCog 64 (44,4%) (p = 0,0001). Los tumores diagnosticados fueron clasificados: ISUP-1: 34 (45,9%), ISUP-2: 21 (28,4%), ISUP-3: 9 (12,2%), ISUP-4: 7 (9,5%), ISUP-5: 3 (4,1%). No existieron diferencias (p = 0,89). La mediana de cilindros afectados en BTRCl fue 1 (IQR 1-5) frente a 2 (IQR 1-4) en el grupo BTRCog (p = 0,93). Variables predictoras independientes de cáncer: edad (OR = 12,05, p = 0,049). TR sospechoso (OR = 2,64, p = 0,04), nódulo hipoecoico en ecografía (OR = 2,20, p = 0,03) y la secuencia RM + BTRCog (OR = 3,49, p = 0,003). Conclusiones: La secuencia RMNmp + BTRCog en pacientes con al menos una BP previa negativa multiplica casi por 3,5 (OR = 3,49) la probabilidad de diagnosticar un cáncer frente a la BTRCl

Introduction: The aim of this study is to compare performance of two biopsy approaches in patients with at least one previous negative prostate biopsy (PB): classical transrectal biopsy (ClTB) versus cognitive registration biopsy (COG-TB). Material and methods: A retrospective study of 205 patients with at least one negative PB. 144 (70.2%) patients underwent a prior mpMRI and 61 (29.8%) patients did not. Nodule classification was carried out according PI-RADS version 2. Peripheral zone (PZ) grouped pZa, pZpl and pZpm areas, transition zone (TZ) Tza, Tzp and Cz areas, and anterior zone (AZ) AS areas. COG-TB was conducted in patients with previous mpMRI (144); while in the remaining 61 (29.8%) patients a ClTB of PZ and TZ was performed. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi square and T-student tests for qualitative and quantitative variables, respectively. Multivariate analysis was carried out in order to identify predictive variables of prostate cancer. Results: Median patient age was 68 (IQR 62-72) years, median PSA was 8.3 (IQR 6.2-11.7) ng/ml and median previous biopsies was 1 (IQR 1-2). Digital rectal examinations (DRE) findings were normal in 169 (82.4%) patients and suspicious in 36 (17.6%) patients (cT2a-b in 34 patients and cT2c in 2). Median prostate volume was 48 (IQR 38-65) cc. Statistically significant differences in PSAD between both groups were found (P = .03). Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) showed hypoechoic nodules in 8 (13.1%) ClTB patients and in 62 (43.1%) COG-TB patients (P=.0001). The median number of biopsy cylinders per set of prostate biopsies was 10 (IQR 10-10) in ClTB group and 11 (IQR 9-13) in COG-TB group (P = .75). Cancer was diagnosed in 74 (36.1%) patients: of them, 10 (16.4%) were ClTB patients and 64 (44.4%) COG-TB (P = .0001). Tumors classification was as follow: ISUP-1: 34 (45.9%), ISUP-2: 21 (28.4%), ISUP-3: 9 (12.2%), ISUP-4: 7 (9.5%) and ISUP-5: 3 (4.1%). No significant statistical differences were found (P = .89). The median number of biopsy cylinders impaired per set of prostate biopsies was 1 (IQR 1-5) in ClTB group and 2 (IQR 1-4) in COG-TB group (P = .93). Regarding independent predictive variables for prostate cancer the results were: age (OR = 12.05; P = .049), suspicious DRE (OR = 2.64; P = .04), hypoechoic nodule (OR = 2.20; P = .03) and mpMRI + COG-TB sequence (OR = 3.49; P = .003). Conclusions: In patients with at least one negative PB, mpMRI + COG-TB sequence improves 3.5 (OR=3.49) times the diagnosis prostate vs. ClTB